When people hear the phrase “Black Terror,” they might assume it belongs to a modern-era puncher with highlight-reel knockouts. Nope. The story goes way further back. The original black terror boxer was Bill Richmond, a pioneering prizefighter who became one of the first Black sporting celebrities in Britain during the bare-knuckle era.
And his fame was not just about winning fights. It was about what he represented in a time when society tried hard to limit who could be seen, celebrated, or respected.
This is the kind of tale that sits right inside the roots of boxing. Raw, political, personal, and honestly pretty unbelievable.
The black terror boxer was William “Bill” Richmond (1763 to 1829), born enslaved in Staten Island, New York, and later taken to England as a teenager by British officer Hugh Percy (Earl Percy, later Duke of Northumberland).
In England, Richmond was educated and apprenticed, but he eventually became known for his skill and composure in the prize ring. He earned the nickname “The Black Terror,” a label that captured how intimidating and effective he looked once the fight started.
That nickname also hints at the era’s vibe. Boxing was not sanitized. It was a public spectacle, tied to status and nationalism, and loaded with racial tension. Richmond fought through that world with technique, calmness, and a reputation that followed him everywhere.
It’s easy to list modern famous black boxers and forget the early trailblazers who made public recognition possible at all. Richmond is often described as the first Black prizefighter to gain major recognition in Regency England, and he became a respected figure in the sport there.
What makes that impressive is the timing. This was long before the world of sanctioned belts, global promotions, and media coverage. This was an age where reputation was built in taverns, newspapers, and the rough word-of-mouth economy of fight fans.
Richmond’s career helped open mental doors, even if society still tried to keep physical ones shut. For boxing, that matters. For history, it matters more.
To understand Richmond, it helps to understand what boxing was back then. Prizefighting in the late 1700s and early 1800s was bare-knuckle, with fewer formal rules and a much harsher toll on the body. It was also deeply tied to class. Wealthy patrons supported fighters. Fighters became symbols. A match could feel like a national event.
That’s why Richmond sits comfortably among boxing history legends even though casual fans might not recognize the name today. He fought in an era when technique mattered because gloves did not soften anything. Dodging, timing, and stamina were survival tools, not style points.
And Richmond was known for skill. Not just brawling. Skill.
Richmond’s career included notable contests that shaped his reputation. Sources discuss his bouts in the context of major early prizefighting figures and the intense public interest surrounding them.
One widely discussed moment in Richmond’s story is how his success sparked reactions beyond the ring, including political commentary tied to race and national pride. That gives a clue about how visible he became. His fights were not “just fights.” They were treated like statements.
This is also why he is often grouped with early boxing champions and major pioneers of professional prizefighting. The sport was still forming its identity, and Richmond was part of that formation.
Check Out: Build Speed & Agility With the Best 5 Boxing Footwork Drills
Modern boxing fans love debating lists. Who belongs on the greatest boxers of all time list? Who had the best chin? Who fought the toughest era? Those debates usually focus on the gloved era, with weight classes, commissions, and recorded footage.
But Richmond’s value is different. He is not famous because of a single belt. He is famous because he proved elite skill and public stature were possible for a Black athlete in a society stacked against him.
That makes him part of the deeper timeline. The “before” that shaped what came “after.” And it’s hard to tell the full history of boxing fighters without acknowledging the men who fought when the sport was still half underground and fully brutal.
Richmond didn’t just fight. He also became an established boxing figure in Britain, including roles connected to training and the boxing scene’s social world.
That detail matters because it shows he wasn’t treated as a short-lived novelty. He became part of the sport’s fabric. A knowledgeable man. A technician. A name people respected.
This is one reason modern writers revisit him when discussing boxing history legends. His impact wasn’t limited to personal wins. It shaped how boxing looked, who boxing could celebrate, and how fighters learned the craft.
It’s tempting to turn Richmond into a superhero story. And sure, the arc is powerful. But the era was also harsh and unfair. He faced racism, political backlash, and a sporting world that could turn brutal overnight.
A better way to frame it is this: Richmond did not “transcend” the system like magic. He navigated it with unusual poise and skill, built alliances, and earned a reputation that even hostile crowds could not ignore. That is the kind of legacy that lasts.
Read More: Story of Kid Tunero: The Lost History of Boxing in Cuba
So, why was he famous? Because the black terror boxer Bill Richmond became a celebrated prizefighter in Regency Britain, gained recognition in an era that rarely offered it to Black athletes, and left a lasting imprint on early professional boxing culture.
And if someone wants to zoom out, his story also connects to the broader lineage of famous black boxers who came later, from the early pioneers to the global icons. Richmond helped prove the platform could exist at all. In a sport built on courage, that kind of courage belongs in the conversation.
The “Black Terror” was Bill Richmond, a bare-knuckle prizefighter who became a prominent Black boxing figure in Regency-era Britain.
He earned the nickname because of his intimidating reputation and high-level skill in the ring, becoming well known to British boxing audiences.
Yes. Many historians describe him as an early, influential Black prizefighter whose career and visibility helped shape the early professional boxing scene.